Complex Hires
The best church staff candidates are rarely on job boards. Passive candidates consistently outperform active ones. Reaching them requires a relational, not transactional search.

One of the most consistent findings in executive search, across industries including the church, is that the best candidates are rarely the ones who are actively looking for a new role. This is not a coincidence. The leaders who are most deeply embedded in meaningful work, who are growing in their current context, and who have the kind of character and competency that makes them excellent long-term placements are almost always the ones who are not on the job boards.
This creates a real challenge for churches that rely primarily on traditional search methods. Posting a position and reviewing applications will consistently produce a pool of candidates that skews toward those who are dissatisfied with their current situation, between roles, or actively seeking a change. These are not necessarily poor candidates, but they are not the same pool as the leaders who are thriving in their current context and could be drawn into the right opportunity through a relational approach.
Reaching passive candidates requires a different kind of search. It begins with what I call a prayerful relational scan: taking time to consider who within the church's existing network might already be the right person. This includes staff, volunteers, and leaders who may be attending the church or known within the personal network of the Senior Pastor and team. This step happens before any public announcement, because the best candidate is sometimes already in the room.
When the search extends beyond the immediate network, it requires relationship-based outreach: connections to seminary networks, denominational leaders, and respected voices in the church world who can point toward the right people.
The first contact with a passive candidate is typically a relational conversation, not a job presentation. It is an expression of genuine interest in their work and their sense of calling. The opportunity is introduced later, once a relationship has been established.
This approach takes longer and requires more relational investment than a traditional search. But it consistently produces better outcomes, because the candidates who emerge from it are those who have been drawn to the opportunity by genuine alignment, not by the need for a change. And candidates who arrive that way are far more likely to stay.
Written by
Chris Folwell
PhD Candidate · M.T.S. · We Love Clarity
Work With Chris
Is your church facing a decision like this?
I work with a small number of churches each year. The first step is always a conversation.
Start a ConversationAbout the Author
Chris Folwell
PhD Candidate in Gospel-Centered Executive Leadership
Master of Theological Studies · Theology
Founder, Love + Lead
Chris works with Senior Pastors and executive teams navigating complex hires, team alignment, and leadership transitions.
Part of the pillar topic
Navigating Complex Church Hires →

Free Assessment
Ten questions. Five minutes. A clear picture of where your church stands before you begin one of the most significant hiring decisions you will ever make. Developed from the Love + Lead search framework.
Free. Five minutes. Chris reviews every result personally.